Labs

Benchmarks & insights.

How purpose-built AI compares to enterprise tools and manual research. Open benchmarks, technical deep-dives, and lessons from the field.

Benchmarks

Romy vs. enterprise wealth screening platforms and manual prospect research.

PIF-Bench Score

Prospect Intelligence Fidelity — composite accuracy benchmark (0-100)

Romy
94.1 94.1
Claude
92.3 92.3
Gemini
79.1 79.1
ChatGPT
76.9 76.9

Time per Prospect

From first search to actionable report

Romy
2 – 10+ min 2 – 10+ min
Enterprise Tools
5 – 15 min 5 – 15 min
Manual Research
~45 minutes ~45 minutes

Cost per Report

Fully loaded cost per full research report, depending on subscription tier

Romy
$0.50 – $5
Enterprise Tools
$8 – $15 $8 – $15
Manual Research
$50+ $50+

Annual Cost

For a team researching ~200 prospects / month

Romy (Growth)
$290 / yr
Romy (Scale)
$1,990 / yr
Enterprise Avg.
$15K – $50K / yr $15K – $50K / yr

Report Depth

Sections in a full donor intelligence report

Romy
16 sections 16 sections
Enterprise Tools
5 – 8 sections 5 – 8 sections
Generic AI
3 – 5 sections 3 – 5 sections

Blog

Technical deep-dives, research findings, and perspectives on nonprofit fundraising.

Research April 2026

PIF-Bench: Benchmarking AI Donor Research — Rōmy vs. ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini

We built a ground-truth benchmark and ran it head-to-head. Rōmy scored 94.6, Claude 92.2, ChatGPT 79.9, Gemini 76.0. Here's the full methodology and results.

Read more

Want to run your own benchmarks?

Try Romy on your own prospect list. See how purpose-built donor intelligence compares to your current workflow.

Get Started Back to Home